After moon landings were actually filmed in a
movie set then where is the evidence?
"the proof is NASA's
own lunar photos and video"
But why are such important images are so
grainy and hard to see?
"They had one picture which
completely controlled black and white, grainy
that convinced every body we are on the moon" |
Images
After moon landings were actually filmed in a movie set then
where is the evidence?
According to David S. Percy, Award Winning Film maker and
Photographer, the proof is NASA's own lunar photos and video.
David S. Percy (Royal Photographic Society):
"My research suggests that the images of the Apollo landing are not
a true accurate record, in our views the Apollo pictures are the
fake, many of the images are repleat with the consistencies in
anomalies "
In Fact, Percy claims when examined these images suggests that the
man never went to the moon at all.

This famous scene of man taking the first step over the lunar
surface is one of the most recognizable in history. But why are such
important images are so grainy and hard to see?
Astronaut on Moon:
"they are giving a picture on the TV, we had a good picture"
NASA claims its the result of 1960's technology.
Brain Welch (NASA Spokesman):
"If you go back and looked at it, the Apollo 11 mission was some
pretty off of video but today's standards the ghostly images just
did not look very real at all and that was the function of the
transmitter at that time, the camera at that time, that we have
available to us to fly Apollo 11"
An Investigative Journalist believes that NASA intentionally made
the images hard to see
Bart Sibrel (Investigative Journalist):
"NASA presented the hoax in a very unique way through television,
they had one picture which completely controlled black and white,
grainy that convinced every body we are on the moon, we had no
reason to doubt it. They had complete grains over the pictures, over
the sound, I mean sad to say it was easier then people believe"
But despite the lack of clarity, conspiracy theory sees the
evidences suggesting these images were staged
Moon hoax proponents devote a substantial portion of their efforts to examining NASA photos. They point to various issues with photographs and films purportedly taken on the Moon. Experts in photography (even those unrelated to NASA) respond that the anomalies, while sometimes counterintuitive, are in fact precisely what one would expect from a real Moon landing, and contrary to what would occur with manipulated or studio imagery. Hoax proponents also state that whistleblowers may have deliberately manipulated the NASA photos in hope of exposing NASA.
Home
<< Back |
Next Page >>
Participate and send us your views
|