Identical Background

The question continue.
Why the images shot in different times and different places appeared to have identical back grounds?

These two photo seemed to have same mountain back drop, yet the lunar muzzle is only present only one of them. Seemingly impossible, since the LEM never moved and its based remained even after the mission.
 

Some suggests that the same artificial backdrops was used when shooting two entirely separate pictures. Back ground discrepancies are also apparent in lunar video.

Howard McCurdy, Ph.D. (Space Historian, American University):
"The best evidence are some pictorial abnormalities and the photographic record of the trip to the moon. There is one for Apollo 16 were the same shot, the same hill appears in two different days"

This take was shot which reported to be the first day of Apollo 16 Lunar excursions..

And this image is from the next day at the different location.

Astronaut on Moon:
"it is the most beautiful sight, its absolutely unreal"

NASA claims the second location was two and half miles away. But when one video shooter imposed the other, the locations appear identical.

Howard McCurdy, Ph.D. (Space Historian, American University):
"The Conspiracy Theories see that as evidence we didn't go to the moon that was staged and opposite point of view it was case of bad acetic"

Identical backgrounds in photos are listed as taken miles apart.

• Shots were not identical, just similar. Background objects were mountains many miles away. Without an atmosphere to obscure distant objects, it can be difficult to tell the relative distance and scale of terrain features. One specific case is debunked in Who Mourns For Apollo?

 Home
<< Back | Next Page >>

Participate and send us your views